Anti-Mullerian hormone level in relation to physical activity and reproductive determinants in North Iranian infertile women

Roya Kabodmehri 1, Seyedeh Hajar Sharami 1*, Forozan Milani 1, Nasrin Ghanami Gashti 1, Mahboubeh Eftekhari 1, Ali Aghazadeh 1

1  Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Al-zahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Corresponding Authors: Seyedeh Hajar Sharami

 * Email: sharami@gums.ac.ir

 

Abstract

Introduction: Female infertility is responsible for approximately half of all cases of infertility and one of the causes of infertility in women is related to ovarian disorders.  Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) is one of the clinical markers of ovarian reserve. Physical activity may affect the reproductive system and AMH concentration in serum. We aim to evaluate the relationship between physical activity and reproductive determining fertility and anti-mullerin hormone (AMH)  in infertile women in northern Iran.  

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 234 women aged 18–45 referred to the Infertility Clinic of the Al-Zahra Hospital, Rasht, Iran. The reproductive characteristics and the amount of physical activity of the patients were recorded. Exclusion criteria included menopause, cancer, underlying endocrine diseases, use of hormonal drugs, diagnosis of PCOS based on Rotterdam criteria, any ovarian and uterine surgery, and endometriosis.

Results: As expected, we observed significantly lower AMH concentrations in older participants. There was no association between reproductive determinants and AMH level (P> 0.05). We observed lack of physical activity as well as vigorous physical activity, is associated with lower AMH concentration (P= 0.025, and P= 0.039 respectively).

Conclusion: In this study, AMH levels appear to be significantly lower in patients with a lack of physical activity as well as vigorous physical activity. The results of this study showed that by improving lifestyle, including the appropriate amount of physical activity, it may be possible to improve the results of infertility treatments. However, a larger study is needed to verify the findings of this study.

Keywords: Anti-Mullerian hormone, AMH, Female infertility, Physical activity,  Lifestyle

Introduction

Female infertility is responsible for approximately half of all cases of infertility and one of the causes of infertility in women is related to ovarian disorders. anti-mullerin hormone (AMH) is produced by the granulosa cells of pre-antral and small antral ovarian follicles and is widely accepted as a clinical marker of ovarian reserve (1). It is a member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, and there is a strong positive correlation between circulating AMH concentrations and the number of follicles in the ovary (2). Since the number of follicles is well correlated with the level of AMH (3), it can reflect the number of dormant follicles in adult women. AMH suppresses the cyclic recruitment of primordial follicles into the pool of growing follicles and its levels decrease with age (4,5), thus serving as a marker of female reproductive aging (6). AMH level is highly variable among women, even measured on the same day in the menstrual cycle. Serum AMH level has been reported to be a highly accurate tool for the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (7) and premature ovarian insufficiency (8). In addition, AMH is used for the prediction of ovarian response during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, and prediction of age at menopause (9,10).

The fact that AMH can't predict the probability of a woman conceiving within a given period may be related partly to variation of circulating AMH even within the same age in different women (11) due to various lifestyle and reproductive characteristics. Konishi et al. (2014) examined the association between AMH levels and menstrual cycle and lifestyle characteristics among young Japanese women. They reported that circulating AMH concentration was significantly lower among young women who had more severe menstrual pain (12). Lower AMH concentration has been found in using oral contraceptives (13), mild/ minimal endometriosis (14), obesity (15), smoking (16), and a regular and shorter menstrual cycle (13).

Physical activity plays an important role in maintaining energy balance which may affect the reproductive system (17). Weight loss via physical activity may protect ovarian function by increasing insulin resistance and changing the hormonal profile (18). It has been reported that an increased risk of infertility was found for the group of women reporting the highest levels of intensity and frequency of physical activity (19). Thus the possible risks of infertility should be highlighted among women who do heavy exercise. Steiner et al. (2010) reported that serum AMH levels do not fluctuate during oral contraceptive use in reproductive-aged women and AMH levels are significantly lower in obese women (1). It has been reported among premenopausal women, that lower AMH levels are associated with older age, younger age at menarche, and currently using oral contraceptives, suggesting these factors are related to decreased ovarian follicles (20). Bernardi et al. (2017) reported a significant association between obesity and lower AMH levels, suggesting that obesity may compromise ovarian reserve(21) through decreased responses to fertility medications, fewer oocytes retrieved (22), and lower pregnancy and live birth rates (23). However, there are contradictions in the literature regarding the association between obesity and AMH levels, so further investigation into this relationship is warranted.

On the other hand, ethnicity is an independent predictor for AMH (18) and the association between AMH and lifestyle factors like body mass index (BMI), smoking, and physical activity may vary across ethnic groups (13). Understanding the factors associated with individual variation of AMH levels among infertile women may help their infertility management. To our knowledge, no study has targeted in North Iranian between infertile women to examine such associations. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the association between age, BMI, reproductive history, and physical activity with serum AMH concentration in North Iranian women with primary/secondary infertility.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This cross-sectional study included 234 women aged 18–45 from April 2019 to March 2020. Patients participating in the study were selected from women candidates for assisted reproductive treatment and referred to the Infertility Clinic of the Al-Zahra Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Exclusion criteria included menopause, cancer, underlying endocrine diseases, use of hormonal drugs, diagnosis of PCOS based on Rotterdam criteria, any ovarian and uterine surgery, and endometriosis. Approval was obtained from the Research Deputy and Ethics Committee of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (Approval ID: IR.GUMS.REC.1398.375). All the participants signed a written informed consent before sample collection and acknowledged that they had been fully anonymized. The reproductive characteristics included age at menarche, cycle regularity status, pregnancy, parity, breastfeeding history, and age at menarche, maternal menopause age. The amount of physical activity of the patients was also recorded. IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) (24) was used to determine the amount of physical activity.

AMH assay

At the time of enrollment up to 5 mL of venous blood was drawn from each participant. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1400g/10min to separate the serum. Serum samples were stored at -20 °C until AMH concentration measurement. Serum AMH was measured using the Beckman Coulter AMH ELISA kit (cat no: B13127) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Software (v21; SPSS Inc; Chicago, Illinois, USA), and P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant and Chi-square tests, fisher exact test, and independent T-test were used to examine the relationship between variables

Results

This cross-sectional analysis included 234 women aged 18–45 years old referred to the Infertility Clinic of the Al-Zahra Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Table 1 includes information on the demographics and reproductive history of the women who participated in the study. As expected, we observed significantly lower AMH concentrations in older participants. The risk of infertility is increased for the group of women who report the highest intensity and frequency of physical activity. There was no significant association between BMI and AMH concentrations (P= 0.37). There was no association between reproductive determinants and AMH level (Table 1).


Table 1. Demographic characteristics and reproductive history of two groups of study.

P value

AMH≥1.11

AMH≤1.10

Variables

0.0001*

 

 

37(27.4%)

85(63%)

13(9.6%)

 

9(9.1%)

37(37.4%)

53(53.3%)

Age (years)

18-30

30-40

>40

0.371*

 

 

42(31.1%)

52(38.5%)

41(30.4%)

 

33(33.3%)

44(44.4%)

22(22.2%)

BMI (kg/m2)

<25

25-30

30

 

0.615*

 

 

120(88.9%)

15(11.1%)

 

90(90.9%)

9(9.1%)

Breastfeeding history

No

Yes

0.429*

 

 

96(71.1%)

39(28.9%)

 

75(75.8%)

24(24.2%)

Menstrual cycle pattern

Regular

Irregular

0.918*

 

 

99(73.3%)

36(26.7%)

 

72(72.2%)

27(27.3%)

Gravidity

0

≥1

0.115*

 

 

118(87.4%)

17(12.6%)

 

79(79.8%)

20(20.2%)

Abortion

0

≥1

0.295*

 

 

120(88.9%)

15(11.1%)

 

92(92.9%)

7(7.1%)

Live birth

0

≥1

0.700**

 

 

132(97.8%)

3(2.2%)

 

96(97%)

3(3%)

Still birth

0

≥1

0.70***

 

12.93±1.33

12.86±1.31

Age at menarche

0.93***

50.85±2.86

50.54±2.47

Maternal menopausal age

*  Chi-squared test                   ** fisher's exact test                *** independent t-test

 

Physical activity is classified into fourepresentsr groups vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, low physical activity (walking), and inactive (sitting). As shown in Figure 1, lack of physical activity, as well as vigorous physical activity, is associated with lower AMH concentration (P= 0.025, and P= 0.039 respectively).

 

Figure 1. The chart representing physical activity in two groups of study. As shown in the chart, lack of physical activity as well as vigorous physical activity is associated with AMH ≤1.10.


Discussion

This study demonstrated that AMH levels are influenced by physical activity. More specifically, we found lack of physical activity, as well as vigorous physical activity, is associated with lower AMH concentration. Improvement of AMH levels and oxidative stress through regular exercise has been reported in Chinese women with PCOS (25). So, improvement of oxidative stress might be an effective method for improvement of AMH level, which deserves further research. It has been reported that the level of AMH in women over 40 years of age was significantly lower than in women less than 35 years of age. Jung et al.(2017) reported higher AMH concentrations in women with older compared to younger ages at menarche (20) while our finding is consistent with other study reported no associations (26). We also observed no association between other reproductive determinants (Table 1) which may be due to the small sample size of the present study or ethnicity variations. So, future large studies are warranted to validate our findings. We observed no association between parity and AMH level that is consistent with earlier studies (20). The decrease of AMH levels with increasing age in adult premenopausal women is well established (26,27) as we observed in this present study.

Regular exercise causes weight loss and improves metabolic function and hormonal profile. It has been reported that the exercises also usually lead to a significant increase in fertility (28). Physical activity improves the quality of life in the general population but there is insufficient evidence for the effect of physical activity and quality of life on improving fertility in infertile women (29). Cicek et al. (2019) reported strength exercise decreases serum AMH levels and increases serum FSH levels (30). Therefore, excessive exercise practices have negative consequences for women's fertility, especially for those with lower ovarian reserve. It has been reported that moderate physical activity is associated with improved age-specific levels of ovarian reserve markers (31).

Physical activity through regulation of energy balance and insulin sensitivity can improve reproductive system function. Vigorous physical activity was associated with reduced fecundity in all women with normal BMI, but not in overweight and obese women (32). However, it has been demonstrated physical activity is unlikely to have a deleterious effect on IVF success and certain forms of vigorous activity may be beneficial (33). AMH can predict the ovarian response to hyperstimulation (34) and a low AMH test result has a negative psychological impact (35). On the other hand, maternal lifestyle during pregnancy may be associated with reproductive health and ovarian reserve in adult offspring (36). So, finding an association between lifestyle parameters such as physical activity and the level of AMH, and changing this lifestyle can affect the health of the next generation.

Conclusions

In this study, AMH levels appear to be significantly lower in patients with a lack of physical activity as well as vigorous physical activity. The results of the present study showed that by improving lifestyle, including the appropriate amount of physical activity, it may be possible to improve hormone levels and thus improve the results of infertility treatments. However, a larger clinical study is indicated to study the association between AMH and physical activity in reproductive-age women.

Author contribution

In this manuscript, the role of each of the authors, conceptualization with RK, conceptualization with FM, data collection with ME, formal Analysis with AA, writing, review and editing with NGhG, and writing an original draft with SHSh.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciated Reproductive Health Research Center of Guilan University of Medical Sciences for their constant support.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding/Support

This Manuscript was not Funded.

References

 

1.     Steiner AZ, Stanczyk FZ, Patel S, Edelman A. Antimullerian hormone and obesity: insights in oral contraceptive users. Contraception. 2010;81(3):245–8.

2.     Karkanaki A, Vosnakis C, Panidis D. The clinical significance of anti-Müllerian hormone evaluation in gynecological endocrinology. Hormones. 2011;10(2):95–103.

3.     Toner JP, Seifer DB. Why we may abandon basal follicle-stimulating hormone testing: a sea change in determining ovarian reserve using antimüllerian hormone. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(7):1825–30.

4.     Dolleman M, Verschuren WMM, Eijkemans MJC, Dollé MET, Jansen E, Broekmans FJM, et al. Reproductive and lifestyle determinants of anti-Müllerian hormone in a large population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):2106–15.

5.     Kelsey TW, Wright P, Nelson SM, Anderson RA, Wallace WHB. A validated model of serum anti-Müllerian hormone from conception to menopause. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22024.

6.     Sowers MFR, Eyvazzadeh AD, McConnell D, Yosef M, Jannausch ML, Zhang D, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B in the definition of ovarian aging and the menopause transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;93(9):3478–83.

7.     Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Nelson SM. Can anti-Müllerian hormone predict the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis of extracted data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(8):3332–40.

8.     Knauff EAH, Eijkemans MJC, Lambalk CB, ten Kate-Booij MJ, Hoek A, Beerendonk CCM, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin B, and antral follicle count in young women with ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;94(3):786–92.

9.     Broer SL, Mol BWJ, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJM. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2011;91(3):705–14.

10.   Broer SL, Eijkemans MJC, Scheffer GJ, Van Rooij IAJ, De Vet A, Themmen APN, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(8):2532–9.

11.   Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM, Fleming R, McConnachie A. Nomogram for the decline in serum antimüllerian hormone: a population study of 9,601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):736–41.

12.   Konishi S, Nishihama Y, Iida A, Yoshinaga J, Imai H. Association of antimüllerian hormone levels with menstrual-cycle type and dysmenorrhea in young asymptomatic women. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1439–43.

13.   Kristensen SL, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Andersen CY, Ernst E, Olsen SF, Bonde JP, et al. The association between circulating levels of antimüllerian hormone and follicle number, androgens, and menstrual cycle characteristics in young women. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(3):779–85.

14.   Lemos NA, Arbo E, Scalco R, Weiler E, Rosa V, Cunha-Filho JS. Decreased anti-Müllerian hormone and altered ovarian follicular cohort in infertile patients with mild/minimal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;89(5):1064–8.

15.   Su HI, Sammel MD, Freeman EW, Lin H, DeBlasis T, Gracia CR. Body size affects measures of ovarian reserve in late reproductive age women. Menopause (New York, NY). 2015;15(5):857.

16.   Sowers MR, McConnell D, Yosef M, Jannausch ML, Harlow SD, Randolph Jr JF. Relating smoking, obesity, insulin resistance and ovarian biomarker changes to the final menstrual period (FMP). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1204:95.

17.   Redman LM. Physical activity and its effects on reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 201112(5):579–86.

18.   Norman RJ, Noakes M, Wu R, Davies MJ, Moran L, Wang JX. Improving reproductive performance in overweight/obese women with effective weight management. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;10(3):267–80.

19.   Gudmundsdottir SL, Flanders WD, Augestad LB. Physical activity and fertility in women: The North-Trøndelag Health Study. Hum Reprod. 2015;24(12):3196–204.

20.   Jung S, Allen N, Arslan AA, Baglietto L, Brinton LA, Egleston BL, et al. Demographic, lifestyle, and other factors in relation to antimüllerian hormone levels in mostly late premenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):1012–22.

21.   Bernardi LA, Carnethon MR, de Chavez PJ, Ikhena DE, Neff LM, Baird DD, et al. Relationship between obesity and anti‐Müllerian hormone in reproductive‐aged African American women. obesity. 2017;25(1):229–35.

22.   Pinborg A, Gaarslev C, Hougaard CO, Andersen AN, Andersen PK, Boivin J, et al. Influence of female bodyweight on IVF outcome: a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of 487 infertile couples. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):490–9.

23.   Shah DK, Missmer SA, Berry KF, Racowsky C, Ginsburg ES. Effect of obesity on oocyte and embryo quality in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):63–70.

24.   Tomioka K, Iwamoto J, Saeki K, Okamoto N. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in elderly adults: the Fujiwara-kyo Study. J Epidemiol. 2011;1109210254.

25.   Wu X, Wu H, Sun W, Wang C. Improvement of anti-Müllerian hormone and oxidative stress through regular exercise in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hormones. 2020;1–7.

26.   Shaw CM, Stanczyk FZ, Egleston BL, Kahle LL, Spittle CS, Godwin AK, et al. Serum antimüllerian hormone in healthy premenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2718–21.

27.   van Rooij IAJ, Broekmans FJM, Scheffer GJ, Looman CWN, Habbema JDF, de Jong FH, et al. Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril. 2015;83(4):979–87.

28.   Al-Eisa E, Gabr SA, Alghadir AH. Effects of supervised aerobic training on the levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and adiposity measures in women with normo-ovulatory and polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(4):499–507.

29.   Orio F, Muscogiuri G, Ascione A, Marciano F, Volpe A, La Sala G, et al. Effects of physical exercise on the female reproductive system. Minerva Endocrinol. 2013;38(3):305–19.

30.   Cicek G, Gorkem U, Yamaner F, Gullu A, Gullu E. Adverse Effect of Different Exercise Types on Ovarian Reserve. J Educ Train Stud. 2019;7(1):115–20.

31.   Kiranmayee D, Praveena T, Himabindu Y, Sriharibabu M, Kavya K, Mahalakshmi M. The effect of moderate physical activity on ovarian reserve markers in reproductive age women below and above 30 years. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10(1):44.

32.   Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Sørensen HT, Riis AH, Hatch EE. A prospective cohort study of physical activity and time to pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1136–42.

33.   Gaskins AJ, Williams PL, Keller MG, Souter I, Hauser R, Chavarro JE, et al. Maternal physical and sedentary activities in relation to reproductive outcomes following IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33(4):513–21.

34.   Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):370–85.

35.   O’Brien Y, Kelleher C, Wingfield M. “So what happens next?” exploring the psychological and emotional impact of anti-Mullerian hormone testing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2020;41(1):30–7.

36.   Eubanks AA, Nobles CJ, Hill MJ, DeCherney AH, Kim K, Sjaarda LA, et al. Recalled maternal lifestyle behaviors associated with anti-müllerian hormone of adult female offspring. Reprod Toxicol. 2020;98:75–81.