Nonalcoholic fatty liver scoring panels shortcut for fibro scanning results or not

Authors

  • Saba Fakhrieh Asl GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Sara Dorosti Gastrointestinal & Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei Caspian Digestive Diseases Research Center and GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran / GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Farahnaz Joukar GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Sara Yeganeh GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Keyvan Aminian Department of Forensic Pathology, School of Medicine, Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  • Afshin Shafaghi GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Keywords:

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Scoring Panels, Predicting

Abstract

Introduction: Liver steatosis has a wide range of conditions from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and eventually cirrhosis. Several panels and scoring systems have been introduced to differentiate steatosis with or without advanced fibrosis and also the degree of fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate eleven different scoring panels in patients with steatosis and compare their results with Fibro Scan.  

Methods: The study was performed on 122 NAFLD patients who were confirmed by ultrasound. The patients were referred to the gastroenterologist in Razi hospital in the north of Iran from September 2017 to April 2018. All patients underwent Fibro Scan. Multiple scoring systems were calculated using the laboratory values. These results were compared with the results of Fibro Scan. AUC for each panel was calculated.

Results: In This study, 62 (50.8%) were men. The mean age of the patients was 47.1±11.7 years.  There were significant differences between patients with or without advanced fibrosis in three panels of APRI, NIPPON, and FIB4 (p=0.03, p=0.01, p=0.005, respectively). AUROC for APRI, NIPPON, and FIB4 were, 0.695 (CI=0.58-0.8, p=0.001), 0.642 (CI: 0.5-0.74, p=0.015) and 0.684 (CI: 0.5-0.7, p=0.002), respectively. None of the other panels had enough sensitivity for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis.

Conclusion: Given the cost-effectiveness of panels, their ease of calculation, and noninvasiveness, FIB4, NIPPON and APRI can be used as useful tools for following, and also for predicting progression to advanced fibrosis.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Fakhrieh Asl , S., Dorosti , S., Mansour-Ghanaei , F., Joukar , F., Yeganeh , S., Aminian , K., & Shafaghi, A. (2023). Nonalcoholic fatty liver scoring panels shortcut for fibro scanning results or not. Journal of Current Oncology and Medical Sciences, 3(4), 590–600. Retrieved from http://submission.journalofcoms.com/index.php/JCOMS/article/view/188

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories